Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 89.7 score against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released just a bit more than a year before. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a greater display pixel density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite's battery performance is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.