Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 79.9. Although the Galaxy S10e is much older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and much lighter. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a larger display and a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.