Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 94.8 score against 79.9. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S20 design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released just 13 months before.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 has a processing unit that's just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, they have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, better 60 fps video frame rates and a larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.