Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a general score of 98 against 79.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's processor is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Pro's processing unit, both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing way worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.