Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 93.4 score against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is newer, a little thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, offering some additional features and increased performance.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit less pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S22 has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the same sensor size and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot higher video resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.