Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density and a little bit worse 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better video quality, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a bigger back-facing camera sensor. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.