Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has an overall score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 score. Although OPPO Find X3 Pro is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S7, it is notably heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S7 features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.