Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 81.7 score against 79.9. Although Samsung Galaxy S8 is much older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and lighter. Galaxy S8 counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.