Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a older, just a bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro. Galaxy S8 Active has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1440 x 2960 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.