Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a global score of 83.3 against 79.9. The Galaxy S9 is a lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but they are equally thin. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 features a slightly better screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2960px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.