Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a overall score of 81 against 79.9. Both phones in this review include the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, heavier and somewhat thicker phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.