Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 88.5 score against 79.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is just a little bit lighter and thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip features a processing unit that's very similar to the CPU in OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a quite greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much larger sensor and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much storage to store more games and applications as OPPO Find X3 Pro, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.