Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 92.3 score against 79.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Find X3 Pro were only released 8 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and a little bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give you all the same operating system features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Pro's one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.