Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a overall score of 94.6 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely heavier but somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, and they were released with only 6 months difference. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 12 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Find X3 Pro both have incredibly similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have the same 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a battery life that is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.