Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much lower screen density, they both have a same size display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a more mega pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.