Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is incredibly older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has as much storage for games and applications as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.