Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's score of 79.9. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Pro. These devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a way better resolution camera in the back. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.