Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 81.1 score against 79.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3216px resolution and a higher pixel density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 12 percent more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and OPPO Find X3 Pro feature quite similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture, a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.