Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a overall score of 79.9 against 79. OPPO Find X3 Pro's construction is newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user all the same OS features.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a much bigger sensor. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.