Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. IPhone 8's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone 8 has a much more powerful processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has lesser cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a way better looking screen than iPhone 8, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3168px resolution, a way bigger display, a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a really brighter display. OPPO Find X6 Pro has a better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Apple iPhone 8 and OPPO Find X6 Pro both count with extremely similar memory for games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.