Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's global score of 72.7. Google Nexus 6P's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released 8 years before. The Google Nexus 6P has a lot better hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a sharper display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little inferior pixels number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more MP, a larger aperture for better low light photography and video and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.