Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X6 Pro, having a 77 score against 72.7. Despite of the fact that the LG V20 is older than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a much sharper display than LG V20, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
LG V20 features a much more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro takes way better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
LG V20 features more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.