Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, with a general score of 79.1 against 72.7. LG V30's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. The LG V30 counts with a much powerful CPU than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a much better looking screen than LG V30, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px. LG V30 has a better memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a really longer battery life than LG V30, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. The OPPO Find X6 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.