Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-03-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's 72.7 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13. LG V50 ThinQ is an noticeably older cellphone than OPPO Find X6 Pro, but it's just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X6 Pro takes better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.