Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-03-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is way better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's general score of 72.7. Galaxy A71 5G's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and OPPO Find X6 Pro has Android 13.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better display density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has more storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a way better hardware performance than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X6 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.