Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 72.7. The Galaxy Note9 is an a lot older phone than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The OPPO Find X6 Pro features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a way better processing power than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X6 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos.
OPPO Find X6 Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.