Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-03-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.62 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than OPPO Find X6 Pro's overall score of 72.7. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an way older phone than the OPPO Find X6 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much more powerful processor than OPPO Find X6 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X6 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and much more brightness. The OPPO Find X6 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X6 Pro also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X6 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. OPPO Find X6 Pro has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.