Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's global score of 73.5. The Google Pixel 2 design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a way better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a bit better display density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a way bigger display. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% more battery size. OPPO Find X7 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a lot more MP camera, better video frame rates and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.