Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is notably older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster). The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a little larger display.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a much bigger sensor.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.