Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-01-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 512 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 score. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while OPPO Find X7 Ultra works with Android 14 OS. The Galaxy A32 body is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a way better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little larger screen and a much better pixels number per inch of display. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features an extremely better CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X7 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.