Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 512 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's general score of 73.5. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is extremely older than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much greater processing power than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little bit larger screen and more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.