Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a global score of 82.1, which is better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra's general score of 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's body is thinner and lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, although it was released 5 years before. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14, providing a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger screen. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A8 Star features a much more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera, higher video frame rate and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.