Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 512 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's 73.5 general score. The Galaxy Note9 body is just a little thinner and just a little lighter than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a really superior performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little bit larger display. Galaxy Note9 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also counts with a much more MP camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.