Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X7 Ultra, with a global score of 76.4 against 73.5. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 5s has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Find X7 Ultra has Android 14 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 5s is a lot older than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, it's design is thinner and a lot lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a very superior hardware performance than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a really brighter display, a little greater pixel quantity per inch in the display, a way bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X7 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.