Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Dark Blue and Light Brown | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 512 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X7 Ultra's score of 73.5. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an incredibly older phone than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, but it is lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X7 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a really brighter screen, a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with an extremely better CPU than OPPO Find X7 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X7 Ultra also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures.
OPPO Find X7 Ultra has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.