Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 4.3 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.62 x 2.77 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2410mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the OPPO R1S, having a global score of 81.3 against 55.7. Even being the best in our current comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is a heavier and a little bit thicker phone than OPPO R1S. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior hardware performance than OPPO R1S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than OPPO R1S, because it has a much better display pixel density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than OPPO R1S, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO R1S, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior battery performance than OPPO R1S, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2410mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than OPPO R1S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.