Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.86 x 2.93 x 0.19 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the OPPO R5s, with a score of 83.7 against 59.3. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is notably newer than OPPO R5s, it's somewhat heavier and notably thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO R5s has Android 4.4.4 version.
OPPO R5s features a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little lower pixel count in each inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than OPPO R5s, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes much clearer videos and photos than OPPO R5s, because although it has a lesser MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way bigger camera aperture. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO R5s, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than OPPO R5s, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.