Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.25 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the OPPO R7, getting an 83.7 score against 58.9. The LG V50 ThinQ design is a lot newer than the OPPO R7's, but it's a lot thicker and heavier. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and OPPO R7 has Android 4.4, giving some nice extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than OPPO R7, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. OPPO R7 has a bit better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, a way smaller screen and a just a little lower screen pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory to install applications and games than OPPO R7, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than OPPO R7, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery performance than OPPO R7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.