Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1866 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than OPPO R7s, having a overall score of 83.7 against 62.2. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is extremely newer than OPPO R7s's, but it's thicker and heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while OPPO R7s has Android 5.1 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better hardware performance than OPPO R7s, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a display that is just as good as the OPPO R7s one, although the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater display density.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than OPPO R7s, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO R7s, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery life than OPPO R7s, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the OPPO R7s, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.