Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.02 x 2.93 x 0.26 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 410.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is a lot better than OPPO R9s's global score of 64. Galaxy A71's body is a lot newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO R9s. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version while OPPO R9s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy A71 features a bit superior CPU than OPPO R9s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a display that's very similar to the OPPO R9s one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a quite worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A71 has a greater camera than OPPO R9s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution. Galaxy A71 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO R9s, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A71 counts with a way better battery life than OPPO R9s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 costs a little more money than OPPO R9s, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.