Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.02 x 2.93 x 0.26 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gold and Pink | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 410.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than the OPPO R9s, with a general score of 86.3 against 64. The Galaxy S10e is a much newer cellphone than the OPPO R9s, although it's just a little heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO R9s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper screen than OPPO R9s, because it has a little bit higher screen density, a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than OPPO R9s, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than OPPO R9s, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10e has just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO R9s, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.