Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a general score of 84.5 against 73.9. IPhone XS Max is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though both were released only 9 months apart. IPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a very superior storage for applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone XS Max counts with just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with greater battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4065mAh battery size. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a camera with a lot higher resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.