Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's score of 73.9. LG V30's construction is incredibly lighter and much thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it was released just 21 months before. LG V30 has just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 has a bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit faster processing unit than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has greater battery life than LG V30, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.