Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when they were only released 1 months apart. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixels amount per display inch.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and the LG V50 ThinQ count with incredibly similar processing units, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.