Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 77.9 score against 73.9. Motorola DROID Turbo's design is lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but it is somewhat thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.