Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-06-12 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Green | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 390 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 overall score. The Galaxy A32 is a newer phone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater display pixels density, a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little larger display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and faster video frame rates.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 has greater battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.