Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a general score of 84.2 against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a way lighter and thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although both of them were only released 8 months apart. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Galaxy A7 (2018) both have really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.