Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a 91.8 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Galaxy A71 5G count with extremely similar displays, although the Galaxy A71 5G also has a just a bit greater display density, a little bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.