Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting an 81 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is a lot thinner and lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though it was released many years before. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back camera with a much better 48 MP resolution, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.