Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's score of 73.9. Galaxy M30s is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when they were only released with a few months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and the Galaxy M30s count with really similar displays, because although the Galaxy M30s has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per inch in the display. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same resolution camera, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger camera aperture and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.